тот день, кода у сестёр отнимут boob armor, станет днём, кода сёстры перестанут быть сёстрами.
27.10.2021, 09:28
Люди нет, обитатели твиттера да.
Значит ты недостаточно ознакомлен с содержимы. Ну или сатира у них настольно тонкая что они сами в нее поверили. Даже в FAQ у них написано:
1a. Is this subreddit satirical or serious? What’s the agenda here?
We like to joke around, but this is sincerely intended to be a space for leftist wargamers
Скажу тебе больше:
1b. Why does a leftist Warhammer subreddit even exist? I’ve never met a Wargaming nazi.
It’s possible you’re sheltered enough to have never met any, but many exist openly. This subreddit also recognizes that an average so-called centrist or apolitical wargamer often upholds certain reactionary tendencies too. Also, many “apolitical” wargaming spaces actively allow harmful ideologies, behaviors, and opinions to fester, while decrying outwardly “political” ones (i.e. trying to deflect from critques that allude to sexism, homophobia, racism etc.). A leftist sub is a place for leftists to congregate, discuss hobby, politics, and praxis together without needing to self-censor or feel left out.
И
1c. What is the difference between liberal and leftist?
Leftists are anti-capitalist, liberals aren't. They often agree on common causes in the form of social issues, such as opposing systemic racism, LGBT+ oppression and abortion restricions. Where they disagree is how to tackle those at an economic level; leftists advocate for establishing a socialist/anarchist society (which involves dismantling unjust racial/economic/gender hierachies), while liberals are advocates of moderate reform and accusing revolutionaries of incivility.
А также
1d. So are liberals allowed? Which ideology is this subreddit FOR?
Ideally, a broad coalition of Anarchists, Marxists and other leftists. The "Marxism" in the name should be a clue that we believe a leftist critique is better than a liberal one, and this will be reflected if mods need to curate content. If you are a liberal, we still have many causes in common, like LGBT+ rights or not giving fascism a single inch.
И далее
https://www.reddit.com/r/Sigmarxism/comments/gx97so/official_rsigmarxism_faq/
1a. Is this subreddit satirical or serious? What’s the agenda here?
We like to joke around, but this is sincerely intended to be a space for leftist wargamers
Скажу тебе больше:
1b. Why does a leftist Warhammer subreddit even exist? I’ve never met a Wargaming nazi.
It’s possible you’re sheltered enough to have never met any, but many exist openly. This subreddit also recognizes that an average so-called centrist or apolitical wargamer often upholds certain reactionary tendencies too. Also, many “apolitical” wargaming spaces actively allow harmful ideologies, behaviors, and opinions to fester, while decrying outwardly “political” ones (i.e. trying to deflect from critques that allude to sexism, homophobia, racism etc.). A leftist sub is a place for leftists to congregate, discuss hobby, politics, and praxis together without needing to self-censor or feel left out.
И
1c. What is the difference between liberal and leftist?
Leftists are anti-capitalist, liberals aren't. They often agree on common causes in the form of social issues, such as opposing systemic racism, LGBT+ oppression and abortion restricions. Where they disagree is how to tackle those at an economic level; leftists advocate for establishing a socialist/anarchist society (which involves dismantling unjust racial/economic/gender hierachies), while liberals are advocates of moderate reform and accusing revolutionaries of incivility.
А также
1d. So are liberals allowed? Which ideology is this subreddit FOR?
Ideally, a broad coalition of Anarchists, Marxists and other leftists. The "Marxism" in the name should be a clue that we believe a leftist critique is better than a liberal one, and this will be reflected if mods need to curate content. If you are a liberal, we still have many causes in common, like LGBT+ rights or not giving fascism a single inch.
И далее
https://www.reddit.com/r/Sigmarxism/comments/gx97so/official_rsigmarxism_faq/
Ну и конечно вишенка на торте
2d. Do we NEED Female Space Marines? Wouldn't Sisters of Battle/female Guard be enough?
Astartes and Sororitas are NOWHERE NEAR equal in terms of spotlight, either in terms of model releases or placement in the lore. If Sisters had separate codices for different orders, multiple important characters, and/or a Chaos variation, and, in addition, if the armies that are canonically mixed-gender such as the Guard had female models, THEN this argument would be a little more credible, but it still wouldn’t because it would still imply some intangible reason for gender difference. Why do you NEED Space Marines to even be explicitly and only masculine at all? In a fictional setting, there is no reason to hardcode discrimination or other issues into your setting unless you’re lazy, careless, or actively harmful.
Same goes for arguing that Celestial Lions/White Scars are sufficient ethnic representation. If you think shunting minorities into the corner constitutes diverse representation, you either lack empathy or you're being diesgenuious.
2e. Why do you want the Imperium to be more progressive? Isn’t that just rainbow fascism?
Gender parity in a dystopia of xenophobia and brutality doesn’t magically make said regime progressive (the Nazis implemented animal welfare policies and it would be preposterous to say that made them progressive). The Imperium’s crimes are not based on gender oppression, the neglect of women in prominent roles is not a thematically essential one, but an arbitrary “it didn’t occur to them to include them” deal. Adding diversity doesn't make them any less grimdark and evil. In addition, having more representation in the most popular and advertised faction could help end tabletop gaming’s reputation as a boys' club.
This also means there's no contradiction between wanting the Imperium to have more diverse representation and recognising that they're still the bad guys.
2d. Do we NEED Female Space Marines? Wouldn't Sisters of Battle/female Guard be enough?
Astartes and Sororitas are NOWHERE NEAR equal in terms of spotlight, either in terms of model releases or placement in the lore. If Sisters had separate codices for different orders, multiple important characters, and/or a Chaos variation, and, in addition, if the armies that are canonically mixed-gender such as the Guard had female models, THEN this argument would be a little more credible, but it still wouldn’t because it would still imply some intangible reason for gender difference. Why do you NEED Space Marines to even be explicitly and only masculine at all? In a fictional setting, there is no reason to hardcode discrimination or other issues into your setting unless you’re lazy, careless, or actively harmful.
Same goes for arguing that Celestial Lions/White Scars are sufficient ethnic representation. If you think shunting minorities into the corner constitutes diverse representation, you either lack empathy or you're being diesgenuious.
2e. Why do you want the Imperium to be more progressive? Isn’t that just rainbow fascism?
Gender parity in a dystopia of xenophobia and brutality doesn’t magically make said regime progressive (the Nazis implemented animal welfare policies and it would be preposterous to say that made them progressive). The Imperium’s crimes are not based on gender oppression, the neglect of women in prominent roles is not a thematically essential one, but an arbitrary “it didn’t occur to them to include them” deal. Adding diversity doesn't make them any less grimdark and evil. In addition, having more representation in the most popular and advertised faction could help end tabletop gaming’s reputation as a boys' club.
This also means there's no contradiction between wanting the Imperium to have more diverse representation and recognising that they're still the bad guys.
С одной стороны политика ГВ весьма убищная в последнее время. С другой стороны я благодарен им за то что они не считают этих ущербных недолюдей своей основной ЦА.
Давайте не будем скатываться в приметивные оскорбления и останемся в пассивной аггрессии. У нас здесь культурный скотный двор
Да и комменты как бэ намекают
Значит ты недостаточно знаком с контингентом реддита.
У меня сложилось ощущение что они дошли до максимального значения и упали в минус. Некоторое врямя назад я дальше саба с мемами перестал вылазить, потому что такой концентрации инцелов и белых рыцарей на защите угнетённых я ещё не видел.
Я где-то слышал мол, два года назад там было всего 1000 сабов
БЭТСОСКИ!
Не перестану говорить, что "Ой, металлические груди не удобно! Меч будет соскальзывать!" - это приколы для минмаксеров.
Да, чисто технически да, на 5-20% шанс соскальзывания оружия под определённым углом не туда есть, но по факту это хуита полная, и какой-нибудь клевец в любом случае пробьёт броню, а меч - не очень. А мейс сломает ребра по любому.
Да, чисто технически да, на 5-20% шанс соскальзывания оружия под определённым углом не туда есть, но по факту это хуита полная, и какой-нибудь клевец в любом случае пробьёт броню, а меч - не очень. А мейс сломает ребра по любому.
Были конечно всякие анатомические доспехи, но по большей части у командования так как сложнее в изготовлении чем гладкий нагрудник, а массово экипировались регулярные войска именно гладким нагрудником. Да и в средневековье доспех не на голое тело надевали, а поверх толстой тканевой рубахи и кольчуги - короче анатомические различия мужчин и женщин под кирассой были чуть больше чем никакими и анатомичность чисто для красоты
И выглядели первые доспехи здорового человека так
Так это церемониальные доспехи(кобры на плечах передают привет). Многие мускулаты, что до нас дошли не были непригодны для использования в бою. К средним векам меж доспехом и телом имелось достаточно пространства, что занимали поддоспешная одежда. Таким образом, не было смысла выделять грудь для женщин, в особых случаях просто слегка увеличивали нагрудную часть, но не как создавать 2 холма.
